Petroleum
Intelligence Weekly's
annual ranking of the world's 50 largest oil companies, a perennial benchmark
survey recognized industry-wide, is the leading source of comparative
performance assessments on all the world's oil companies. The Rankings are
based on six operational criteria that allow the comparison of private sector
and state-owned oil companies and is the precursor to the more comprehensive Energy Intelligence Top 100:
Ranking The World's Oil Companies.
National Oil Companies Strengthen Their Hold in Annual Survey
In
contrast to national oil companies, the major oil companies and other private
sector firms generally lost ground, especially in the top tiers. In contrast to
other super majors, Exxon Mobil held on to its number three position. A
comparison with results from 10 years ago shows that the top major oil
companies, as a group, now account for a smaller global share of the six
ranking criteria than they did prior to the mega-mergers that created them.
Here are some key findings
from the PIW Top 50:
·
Saudi Aramco
remains No. 1, and China's CNPC surpasses BP and Shell.
·
Russia's Rosneft makes biggest
jump, from 24th to 16th.
·
Majority state-owned national oil
companies now make up 27 of 50.
·
Three new firms moved into the PIW
Top 50 -- Uzbekneftegas,
China's CNOOC and Kazmunaigas of Kazakhstan -- all majority
state-owned.
The PIW Top 50 can only give you a glimpse of
the performance of the world's key energy companies. You can find out exactly
how your company, client or competitor ranks against industry peers with the Energy Intelligence Top 100:
Ranking the World's Oil Companies.
This annual special report from Energy Intelligence Research provides
a detailed picture of how the leading energy companies -- both publicly traded
and state-owned firms -- have performed. With coverage of more than 160
operational and performance criteria for the 130 largest oil companies in the
world, it allows you to assess operating strengths and weaknesses, set goals
based on peer performance and identify your best-in-class competitors.
View Petroleum Intelligence Weekly Home Page
View the Energy Intelligence Top 100: Ranking the World's
Oil Companies Home Page
PIW's Top 50: How the Firms Stack Up
|
Rank2007
|
Rank2006
|
PIWIndex
|
Company
|
Country
|
State
Ownership %
|
|
1
|
1
|
30
|
Saudi Aramco
|
Saudi Arabia
|
100
|
|
2
|
2
|
33
|
NIOC
|
Iran
|
100
|
|
3
|
3
|
37
|
Exxon Mobil
|
US
|
|
|
4
|
5
|
51
|
PDV
|
Venezuela
|
100
|
|
5
|
7
|
53
|
CNPC
|
China
|
100
|
|
6
|
4
|
55
|
BP
|
UK
|
|
|
7
|
6
|
63
|
Shell
|
UK/Netherlands
|
|
|
8
|
8
|
83
|
ConocoPhillips
|
US
|
|
|
9
|
9
|
88
|
Chevron
|
US
|
|
|
10
|
10
|
90
|
Total
|
France
|
|
|
11
|
11
|
91
|
Pemex
|
Mexico
|
100
|
|
12
|
12
|
99
|
Sonatrach
|
Algeria
|
100
|
|
13
|
12
|
102
|
Gazprom
|
Russia
|
50.0023
|
|
14
|
14
|
103
|
KPC
|
Kuwait
|
100
|
|
15
|
15
|
111
|
Petrobras
|
Brazil
|
32.2
|
|
16
|
24
|
116
|
Rosneft
|
Russia
|
75.16
|
|
17
|
18
|
124
|
Petronas
|
Malaysia
|
100
|
|
18
|
16
|
126
|
Adnoc
|
UAE
|
100
|
|
18
|
17
|
126
|
Lukoil
|
Russia
|
|
|
20
|
19
|
141
|
NNPC
|
Nigeria
|
100
|
|
21
|
19
|
144
|
Eni
|
Italy
|
30
|
|
22
|
21
|
159
|
QP
|
Qatar
|
100
|
|
23
|
23
|
162
|
Libya NOC
|
Libya
|
100
|
|
24
|
22
|
166
|
INOC†
|
Iraq
|
100
|
|
25
|
29
|
173
|
Sinopec
|
China
|
71.84
|
|
26
|
28
|
176
|
StatoilHydro
|
Norway
|
62.5
|
|
27
|
26
|
177
|
EGPC
|
Egypt
|
100
|
|
28
|
25
|
180
|
Repsol YPF
|
Spain
|
|
|
29
|
27
|
187
|
Surgutneftegas
|
Russia
|
|
|
30
|
30
|
215
|
Pertamina
|
Indonesia
|
100
|
|
31
|
31
|
223
|
ONGC
|
India
|
74.14
|
|
32
|
34
|
246
|
Marathon
|
US
|
|
|
32
|
32
|
246
|
PDO
|
Oman
|
60
|
|
34
|
37
|
264
|
EnCana
|
Canada
|
|
|
34
|
--
|
264
|
Uzbekneftegas
|
Uzbekistan
|
100
|
|
36
|
36
|
273
|
Socar
|
Azerbaijan
|
100
|
|
37
|
35
|
288
|
SPC
|
Syria
|
100
|
|
38
|
39
|
290
|
Ecopetrol
|
Colombia
|
89.9
|
|
39
|
42
|
291
|
Apache
|
US
|
|
|
39
|
44
|
291
|
CNR
|
Canada
|
|
|
41
|
37
|
294
|
Anadarko
|
US
|
|
|
42
|
41
|
296
|
Devon Energy
|
US
|
|
|
43
|
40
|
297
|
TNK-BP‡
|
Russia
|
|
|
44
|
43
|
298
|
OMV
|
Austria
|
31.5
|
|
45
|
48
|
305
|
Hess
|
US
|
|
|
46
|
44
|
310
|
Occidental
|
US
|
|
|
47
|
47
|
312
|
BG
|
UK
|
|
|
48
|
51
|
316
|
CNOOC
|
China
|
66.41
|
|
49
|
50
|
322
|
Inpex
|
Japan
|
29.35
|
|
50
|
52
|
323
|
Kazmunaigas
|
Kazakhstan
|
100
|
Methodology of PIW Ranks the World's Top Oil Companies
Contact us
for more information
Click
here to preview the December 01, 2008 press
release: Energy Intelligence Ranks World's 50 Top Oil Companies in Benchmark
Survey
PIW's
ranking of the world's 50 largest oil companies is based on operational data
from over 130 firms. The focus on operations allows meaningful comparisons of
all types of companies -- including state-owned firms -- and thus
differs from more financially oriented corporate rankings. PIW's
unique system uses as criteria oil reserves and production, natural gas
reserves and output, refinery capacity, and product sales volumes.
Firms are compared in six different
operational areas in the table below, with companies assigned
a separate rank within each category. The six individual ranks are then added
together to determine the cumulative, overall position, giving each of the six
criteria an equal weighting.
The rankings above are based on the
2007 operational results for the companies as they existed at the end of that
year or as they reported them. Estimates are used mainly for
state-owned oil companies that do not release regular or complete annual
reports in a timely fashion. Some numbers reflect estimates when complete
corporate data are not available. PIW's system of
ranking tends to favor national oil companies with large oil and gas reserves,
and to favor integrated concerns over firms that specialize in one industry
sector.
To round out the picture, basic
financial data are provided for the companies. But these data are not used to
create the PIW Top 50 rankings,
since they are based on widely differing accounting practices.
Data in the tables above are
primarily from company sources and annual reports. In some
cases, secondary sources or PIW estimates have been used to fill in the gaps.
Data are usually shown as reported by the companies but are sometimes adjusted
for interests or shares held by others. Data for the Russian and Caspian firms
are drawn from Energy Intelligence Research's 2008, Almanac of Russian &
Caspian Petroleum.