Petroleum
Intelligence Weekly's
annual ranking of the world's 50 largest oil companies, a perennial benchmark
survey recognized industry-wide, is the leading source of comparative
performance assessments on all the world's oil companies. The Rankings are
based on six operational criteria that allow the comparison of private sector
and state-owned oil companies and is the precursor to the more comprehensive Energy Intelligence Top 100:
Ranking The World's Oil Companies.
Saudi Aramco
and Exxon Mobil remain entrenched at the top, while mergers, acquisitions and state
consolidation continue to make their mark. With high oil prices continuing to
fuel resource nationalism among the traditional 100% state-owned national oil
companies, the most impressive gains came from hybrid, partly state-owned firms
from emerging economies including Russia, China and India. Half of the 20 firms
advancing in this year's Top 50
are state-controlled, evidence of their continued and increasing dominance.
Here are five key findings
from the PIW Top 50:
- Saudi Aramco, perennial holder of the Rankings' top spot, continues to solidify
its supremacy with significant investment in both upstream and downstream
oil and gas operations.
- Russian gas giant Gazprom, aided by its
acquisition of Sibneft,
continues to forge ahead, gaining nine places to reach number 15 on its
march toward the top ten. Similarly, new assets helped Rosneft advance five spots to
number 26.
- Occidental returns to the Top 50 with help from its purchase of
Vintage Petroleum, while Canadian Natural Resources makes its Top 50 debut after spending the
previous four years waiting in the wings.
- PetroChina moved deeper into the top ten to reach
7th place. In the process, it overtook both Chevron and Total,
which tied for 8th.
- The US again dominates this year's rankings
with ten firms in the Top 50,
followed by Russia with six and the UK and Canada with three each.
The PIW Top 50 can only give you a glimpse of
the performance of the world's key energy companies. You can find out exactly
how your company, client or competitor ranks against industry peers with The Energy Intelligence Top
100: Ranking The World's Oil Companies.
This annual special report from Energy Intelligence Research provides
a detailed picture of how the leading energy companies -- both publicly traded
and state-owned firms -- have performed. With coverage of more than 160
operational and performance criteria for the 100 largest oil companies in the
world, it allows you to assess operating strengths and weaknesses, set goals
based on peer performance and identify your best-in-class competitors.
View Petroleum Intelligence Weekly Home Page
View The Energy Intelligence Top 100: Ranking The World's Oil Companies
Home Page
PIW's Top 50: How The Firms Stack
Up
|
Rank
2005
|
Rank
2004
|
PIW
Index
|
Company
|
Country
|
State
Ownership
(%)
|
|
1
|
1
|
30
|
Saudi Aramco
|
Saudi Arabia
|
100
|
|
2
|
2
|
36
|
Exxon Mobil
|
US
|
|
|
3
|
4
|
39
|
NIOC
|
Iran
|
100
|
|
4
|
3
|
44
|
PDV
|
Venezuela
|
100
|
|
5
|
5
|
48
|
BP
|
UK
|
|
|
6
|
6
|
59
|
Royal Dutch
Shell
|
UK/Netherlands
|
|
|
7
|
9
|
68
|
PetroChina
|
China
|
90
|
|
8
|
8
|
78
|
Chevron
|
US
|
|
|
8
|
7
|
78
|
Total
|
France
|
|
|
10
|
9
|
83
|
Pemex
|
Mexico
|
100
|
|
11
|
11
|
94
|
ConocoPhillips
|
US
|
|
|
12
|
12
|
96
|
Sonatrach
|
Algeria
|
100
|
|
13
|
13
|
100
|
KPC
|
Kuwait
|
100
|
|
14
|
14
|
106
|
Petrobras
|
Brazil
|
32
|
|
15
|
24
|
108
|
Gazprom
|
Russia
|
50.002
|
|
16
|
19
|
130
|
Lukoil
|
Russia
|
|
|
17
|
16
|
132
|
Adnoc
|
UAE
|
100
|
|
18
|
17
|
134
|
Eni
|
Italy
|
|
|
19
|
18
|
137
|
Petronas
|
Malaysia
|
100
|
|
20
|
21
|
143
|
NNPC
|
Nigeria
|
100
|
|
21
|
20
|
152
|
Repsol YPF
|
Spain
|
|
|
22
|
25
|
156
|
LibyaNOC
|
Libya
|
100
|
|
23
|
22
|
168
|
INOC
|
Iraq
|
100
|
|
24
|
23
|
183
|
EGPC
|
Egypt
|
100
|
|
24
|
26
|
183
|
QP
|
Qatar
|
100
|
|
26
|
31
|
185
|
Rosneft
|
Russia
|
75
|
|
26
|
27
|
185
|
Surgutneftegas
|
Russia
|
|
|
28
|
28
|
189
|
Sinopec
|
China
|
55
|
|
29
|
30
|
191
|
Statoil
|
Norway
|
71
|
|
30
|
32
|
224
|
ONGC
|
India
|
74
|
|
31
|
33
|
241
|
Marathon
|
US
|
|
|
32
|
29
|
242
|
Yukos
|
Russia
|
|
|
33
|
15
|
253
|
Pertamina
|
Indonesia
|
100
|
|
34
|
37
|
277
|
SPC
|
Syria
|
100
|
|
35
|
34
|
283
|
PDO
|
Oman
|
60
|
|
36
|
50
|
292
|
OMV
|
Austria
|
32
|
|
36
|
36
|
292
|
Socar
|
Azerbaijan
|
100
|
|
38
|
41
|
298
|
TNK-BP
|
Russia
|
|
|
39
|
40
|
303
|
EnCana
|
Canada
|
|
|
40
|
35
|
310
|
Ecopetrol
|
Colombia
|
100
|
|
41
|
39
|
313
|
Petro-Canada
|
Canada
|
|
|
42
|
45
|
317
|
Hess
|
US
|
|
|
43
|
42
|
319
|
Devon Energy
|
US
|
|
|
44
|
43
|
322
|
Anadarko
Petroleum
|
US
|
|
|
45
|
46
|
328
|
Apache
|
US
|
|
|
46
|
51
|
332
|
Occidental
|
US
|
|
|
47
|
44
|
336
|
Norsk Hydro
|
Norway
|
44
|
|
48
|
48
|
337
|
Burlington
Resources
|
US
|
|
|
49
|
47
|
344
|
BG Group
|
UK
|
|
|
50
|
52
|
349
|
CNR
|
Canada
|
|
Methodology of PIW Ranks The World's Top Oil
Companies
PIW's ranking of the world's 50 largest oil companies is
based on operational data from over 130 firms. The focus on operations allows
meaningful comparisons of all types of companies -- including
state-owned firms -- and thus differs from more financially oriented corporate
rankings. PIW's unique system uses as criteria oil
reserves and production, natural gas reserves and output, refinery capacity,
and product sales volumes.
Firms are compared in six different
operational areas in the table below, with companies assigned
a separate rank within each category. The six individual ranks are then added
together to determine the cumulative, overall position, giving each of the six
criteria an equal weighting.
The rankings above are based on the
2005 operational results for the companies as they existed at the end of that
year or as they reported them. Estimates are used mainly for
state-owned oil companies that do not release regular or complete annual
reports in a timely fashion. Some numbers reflect estimates when complete
corporate data are not available. PIW's system of
ranking tends to favor national oil companies with large oil and gas reserves,
and to favor integrated concerns over firms that specialize in one industry
sector.
To round out the picture, basic financial
data are provided for the companies. But these data are not used to create the
PIW top 50 rankings, since they are based on widely differing
accounting practices.
Data in the tables below are
primarily from company sources and annual reports. In some
cases, secondary sources or PIW estimates have been used to fill in the gaps.
Data are usually shown as reported by the companies but are sometimes adjusted
for interests or shares held by others. Data for the Russian and Caspian firms
are drawn from Energy Intelligence Research's 2006, Almanac of Russian &
Caspian Petroleum.